>Adoption of a network approach to sustainable building standard process

Posted: February 25, 2011 in Uncategorized

>

Adoption of a network approach to sustainable building standard process, not product: a response column to ‘A political-ecology of the built environment: LEED certification for green buildings’, Cidell, 2009, Local Environment, 14(7), pp. 621-633.

Authors:

Spinks, Martine1 m.spinks@ucl.ac.uk

Source:

Local Environment; Jan2011, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p87-92, 6p

Document Type:

Article

Subject Terms:

*SUSTAINABLE buildings — Design & construction
*CERTIFICATION
*ENVIRONMENTAL standards
*POLITICAL ecology
*BUILT environment
*ACTOR-network theory
LEADERSHIP in Energy & Environmental Design Green Building Rating System

Author-Supplied Keywords:

actor-network theory
boundary objects
hybridity
LEED
networks
sustainable building

Abstract:

Cidell’s (2009) A political-ecology of the built environment: LEED certification for green buildings (Local Environment, 14 (7), 621-633) presented a political-ecology approach to analyse and champion LEED. In this response column, I propose that a network approach is a more appropriate conceptual framework. Using elements found in actor-network theory, I present a more complete conceptualisation of socio-material hybridity, enabling a deconstruction of the processes of sustainable building as opposed to a focus on the products of sustainable building certification. I propose that a risk associated with reifying social actor agency and specialist techno-ecological knowledge, as Cidell’s (2009) work implies, is the black boxing of sustainable buildings. I contend that researchers should approach sustainable building standards such as LEED as the mobilisers of network actions instead of the inputs and outputs of epistemic engagements. In relation, I also present the concepts of boundary object and translation as alternative concepts for analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

 
 

Copyright of Local Environment is the property of Routledge and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder’s express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Author Affiliations:

1Bartlett School of Planning, University College London, London, U.K.

ISSN:

13549839

DOI:

10.1080/13549839.2010.541232

Accession Number:

57949118

Database:

Academic Source Complete

Publisher Logo:


 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s